Volvo V70 II
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20vsAUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6)
4.2 V8 40V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V
- Most powerful335 hp250 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t138 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 335hp250kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,435kg5,368lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.7s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 4,163cc254cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,933mm194in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,463mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,843mm112in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,612mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,660L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 281g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 5,200 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 6,600 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.7 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW |
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V has 35 hp more than Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20 and AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 5.9 s |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 6.2 s |
Although AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V has more power, Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20 and AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 186 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | 335 hp 250 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20 | AUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)4.2 V8 40V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 335 hp 250 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 281 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II R 2.5i V20
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 Avant (4F/C6) 4.2 V8 40V
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























