AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001
Car comparison
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) · Facelift 2001 2.7 V6vsNissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y34)
2.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Best estimated range661 km411 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 319Nm235lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | - |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.7s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 603km375mi Calculated | 661km411mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,671cc163cu in | 2,498cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,865mm192in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,453mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,759mm109in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Max trunk volume | 434L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 278g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 5,800 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 6,400 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 319 Nm 235 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 6.8 s |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 and Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 603 km 375 mi |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 661 km 411 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 V6 | NissanCedric (Y34)2.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 319 Nm 235 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 603 km 375 mi | 661 km 411 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 278 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 434 L 15.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6 | Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) Facelift 2001 2.7 V6
- Has 31 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Nissan Cedric (Y34) 2.5T
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























