Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIvsAUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A5L Sportback (B10)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,119 km695 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,810 kg3,990 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,828kg4,030lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,270kg5,004lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 113.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 138.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 39.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km33.9mpg US40.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,883mm74in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,627mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 410L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,361L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 39.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI has 36 hp more than AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI | AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km33.9 mpg US40.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 12.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 19.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,040 L275 US gal229 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,819 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 238 km (148 mi) more estimated range
- Has 153 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 18 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























