AUDI A5L Sportback (B10)
Car comparison
AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSIvsSkoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,347 km837 mi
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 138.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 128.6s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.0s Calculated | 42.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km33.9mpg US40.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 880km547mi Calculated | 1,347km837mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,869mm192in |
| Width | 1,883mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,922mm115in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,627mm64in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 625L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,361L | 1,760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 187g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.0 s | 42.2 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 880 km 547 mi |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,347 km 837 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 880 km 547 mi | 1,347 km 837 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 187 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km33.9 mpg US40.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.13 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.52 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,040 L275 US gal229 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,819 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5L Sportback (B10) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 467 km (290 mi) more estimated range
- Has 215 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























