Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2019-2020
VS

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,347 km
    837 mi
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,525 kg
    3,362 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,525kg3,362lb
1,590kg3,505lb
Gross weight
2,130kg4,696lb
2,295kg5,060lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
125.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
128.6s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
37.2s
Calculated
42.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,031km641mi
Calculated
1,347km837mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,869mm192in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,837mm112in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,581mm62in
1,572mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
136mm5in
Trunk volume
563L
625L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
1,760L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions-
187g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,900-3,300 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.2 s
42.2 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,590 kg
3,505 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI7.7 s
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,031 km
641 mi
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,347 km
837 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
239 km/h
149 mph
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
8.0 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
8.0 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
1,031 km
641 mi
1,347 km
837 mi
CO2 score
-
187 g/km
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Is 65 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 316 km (196 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 ultra
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 ultra
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)3.0 TDI V6
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster