AUDI A5 Coupe (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,310 km814 mi
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk465 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.8s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 96.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.5s Calculated | 49.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | 1,310km814mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,673mm184in | 4,256mm168in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,406mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,764mm109in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 465L | 312L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,006L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 3,250-4,200 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.5 s | 49.5 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 930 km 578 mi |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,310 km 814 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TDI | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | 1,310 km 814 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 465 L 16.4 cu ft | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 153 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 379 km (236 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























