AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDIvsMini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F67)
Cooper C 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,074 km667 mi
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 100.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.7s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,074km667mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,673mm184in | 3,879mm153in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,765mm109in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,499mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 143g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.7 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW |
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI has 27 hp more than Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 and AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 8.0 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 1,074 km 667 mi |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (F5)40 TDI | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,074 km 667 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 143 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI | Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (F5) 40 TDI
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 407 km (253 mi) more estimated range
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
- Is 385 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























