Mini Convertible (F67)
Car comparison
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0vsMini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F57)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 88.5s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.9s Calculated | 42.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,879mm153in | 3,850mm152in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,499mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 115mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | 215L | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 116g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.9 s | 42.1 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0 has 7 hp more than Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 8.2 s |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.7 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 116 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 | Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 333 km (207 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























