AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30VvsPeugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 607
3.0 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
- Best estimated range816 km507 mi
- Largest trunk481 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 207hp154kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 285Nm210lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 2,140kg4,718lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 28.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 816km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 2,946cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,479mm176in | 4,877mm192in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,539mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,479mm58in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 481L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 28.9 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V has 14 hp more than AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V and Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 7.4 s |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 8.1 s |
Although Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V has more power, AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V and Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 660 km 410 mi |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 816 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | Peugeot6073.0 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 207 hp 154 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 816 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 481 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V | Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Is 315 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 607 3.0 V6 24V
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Has 157 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























