AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30VvsPeugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 406 (PHASE II)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 207hp154kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 285Nm210lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 2,946cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,479mm176in | 4,600mm181in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,479mm58in | 1,482mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW |
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has 14 hp more than AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V and Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 7.4 s |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 8.1 s |
Although Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6 has more power, AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V and Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | Peugeot406 (PHASE II)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 207 hp 154 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Peugeot 406 (PHASE II) 3.0 V6
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























