Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

163 hp1999 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016

2.0 TDI

150 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    163 hp
    122 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    104 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,375 km
    854 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0dAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
163hp122kW
150hp112kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,545kg3,406lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,190kg4,828lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
80.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
74.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
34.3s
Calculated
34.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,375km854mi
Calculated
1,136km706mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,458mm176in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,796mm71in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,416mm56in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,637mm104in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,555mm61in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,526mm60in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume
505L
425L
Max trunk volume-
880L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
50L
CO2 emissions
104g/km
110g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0dAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.3 s
34.9 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.9 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
150 hp
112 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 13 hp more than AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
229 km/h
142 mph
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
224 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.7 s
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI8.6 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has more power, AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,375 km
854 mi
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1,136 km
706 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
163 hp
122 kW
8.7 s
229 km/h
142 mph
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
150 hp
112 kW
8.6 s
224 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
8.7 s
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0dAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
163 hp
122 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.6 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
224 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,458 mm
175.5 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Range score
1,375 km
854 mi
1,136 km
706 mi
CO2 score
104 g/km
110 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
Consumption4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.00 LC100 km7.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.27 LC100 mi12.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used600 L159 US gal132 UK gal660 L174 US gal145 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,050 LC/year1,155 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 239 km (148 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI

  • Is 235 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0 TDI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)35 TFSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 TDI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202435 TFSI
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.0 TDI
1.5 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d vs AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster