AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 35 TFSIvsMini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F67)
Cooper C 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score44/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score45/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 106.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 100.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 3,879mm153in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,499mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 320L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 has 13 hp more than AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 8.9 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI | Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























