AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range917 km570 mi
- Largest trunk325 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score65/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 1,915kg4,222lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 25.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 917km570mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,241mm167in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,424mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,602mm102in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 325L |
| Max trunk volume | 645L | 1,060L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 25.2 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 917 km 570 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.1 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 917 km 570 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 44 km (27 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























