AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Sedan (8V)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score70/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 63.5s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 24.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 873km542mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,456mm175in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,637mm104in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 245L | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 645L | 845L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 230g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 24.7 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI has 6 hp more than AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 6.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 873 km 542 mi |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 873 km 542 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 230 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 245 L 8.7 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Emits 86 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 227 km (141 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























