Car comparison

AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016

2.0 TDI

150 hp1968 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2016-2017
VS

Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016

2.0 D3

150 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.5 L/100 km
    67.2 mpg US
    80.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    99 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,632 km
    1,014 mi
  • Largest trunk
    335 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    97/100
  • Best practicality score
    72/100

AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    214 km/h
    133 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    110 hp/t
    82 kW/t
    9.1 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,486kg3,276lb
Gross weight
1,920kg4,233lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
85.1s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
87.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
46.0s
Calculated
53.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,100km684mi
Calculated
1,632km1,014mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,241mm167in
4,369mm172in
Width
1,777mm70in
1,783mm70in
Height
1,424mm56in
1,439mm57in
Wheelbase
2,602mm102in
2,647mm104in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,514mm60in
1,546mm61in
Ground clearance-
144mm6in
Trunk volume
325L
335L
Max trunk volume
1,060L
1,500L
Doors
3
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
62L
CO2 emissions
128g/km
99g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3PowerTorque
  • AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D33,750 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.0 s
53.3 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
150 hp
112 kW
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
1,486 kg
3,276 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
214 km/h
133 mph
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI8.2 s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D38.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1,100 km
684 mi
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
1,632 km
1,014 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
150 hp
112 kW
8.2 s
214 km/h
133 mph
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
150 hp
112 kW
8.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
325 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
4,241 mm
167.0 in
Height
1,424 mm
56.1 in
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK

AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.2 s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,486 kg
3,276 lb
Fuel consumption
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
325 L
11.5 cu ft
Length
4,241 mm
167.0 in
Height
1,424 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,100 km
684 mi
1,632 km
1,014 mi
CO2 score
128 g/km
99 g/km
Trunk score
325 L
11.5 cu ft
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
Consumption5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.75 LC100 km6.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.08 LC100 mi10.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used750 L198 US gal165 UK gal570 L151 US gal125 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,313 LC/year997.50 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 126 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3

  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 532 km (330 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 29 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
Volvo V40 2.0 D3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
2.0 D3
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsVolvoV402.0 D4
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI
2.0 D3
2.0 D3
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsVolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3
2.0 TDI
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra
2.0 D3
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsVolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)35 TDI
2.0 TDI
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202435 TFSI
2.0 D3
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
2.0 TDI
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
2.0 D3
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsSeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
VS
AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI vs Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster