Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAirvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016

1.4 TB MultiAir

150 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018
VS

Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016

2.0 D3

150 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.5 L/100 km
    67.2 mpg US
    80.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    99 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,632 km
    1,014 mi
  • Best economy score
    97/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,290kg2,844lb
1,486kg3,276lb
Gross weight-
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
81.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
87.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
50.4s
Calculated
53.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,091km678mi
Calculated
1,632km1,014mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,368cc83cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,351mm171in
4,369mm172in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,783mm70in
Height
1,465mm58in
1,439mm57in
Wheelbase
2,364mm93in
2,647mm104in
Front track
1,554mm61in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,554mm61in
1,546mm61in
Ground clearance-
144mm6in
Trunk volume-
335L
Max trunk volume-
1,500L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
62L
CO2 emissions
127g/km
99g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAirVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir5,500 rpm2,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D33,750 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.4 s
53.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
150 hp
112 kW
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
1,290 kg
2,844 lb
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
1,486 kg
3,276 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir8.2 s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D38.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
1,091 km
678 mi
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
1,632 km
1,014 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
150 hp
112 kW
8.2 s
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
150 hp
112 kW
8.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.2 s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,290 kg
2,844 lb
1,486 kg
3,276 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
3.8 L/100 km
61.9 mpg US
74.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,351 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,091 km
678 mi
1,632 km
1,014 mi
CO2 score
127 g/km
99 g/km
Trunk score
-
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAirVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km6.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi10.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal570 L151 US gal125 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year997.50 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir

  • Is 196 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 541 km (336 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 28 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) 1.4 TB MultiAir
Volvo V40 2.0 D3
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.4 TB MultiAir
2.0 JTDM
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)2.0 JTDM
2.0 D3
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsVolvoV402.0 D4
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
2.0 D3
2.0 D3
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsVolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TP
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
2.0 D3
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsVolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4
1.4 TB MultiAir
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsSeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI
2.0 D3
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 D3
2.0 JTDM
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3vsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20162.0 JTDM
1.4 TB MultiAir
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsSeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI
1.4 TB MultiAir
2.0 D3
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.5 TFSI
VS
Alfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI
Alfa Romeo Giulietta (TYPE 940) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir vs Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 - car comparison - FastVsFaster