AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score64/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 172hp128kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 271Nm200lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 1,975kg4,354lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 52.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 800km497mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,238mm167in | 4,421mm174in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,409mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,010L | 678L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 52.6 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW |
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI has 28 hp more than AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 6.6 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW | 7.8 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 172 hp 128 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 800 km 497 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 9 Nm more
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























