AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V)
1.8 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions128 g/km
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk325 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score65/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Most powerful172 hp128 kW
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 172hp128kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 271Nm200lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | - |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.2s Calculated | 52.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,421mm174in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,409mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,060L | 678L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 128g/km | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.2 s | 52.8 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW |
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T has 22 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 172 hp 128 kW | 7.8 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 172 hp 128 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 271 Nm 200 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 128 g/km | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 69 Nm more
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 1.8 T
- Has 22 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























