Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsAUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A1 Sportback (GB)
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,313kg2,895lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,898kg4,184lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 70.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,029mm159in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,433mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,563mm101in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 847 km 527 mi |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI | AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 181 km (112 mi) more estimated range
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 53 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























