AUDI A1 Sportback (GB)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSIvsAUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A1 citycarver (GB)
35 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Lightest1,200 kg2,646 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,260kg2,778lb | 1,200kg2,646lb |
| Gross weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,029mm159in | 4,046mm159in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,756mm69in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,563mm101in | 2,566mm101in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,501mm59in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 335L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI has 50 hp more than AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 6.5 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI and AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 667 km 414 mi |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI | AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























