Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8vsAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed316 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful558 hp416 kW
- Best power-to-weight336 hp/t251 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score76/100
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8
- Highest torque685 Nm505 lb-ft
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 558hp416kW | 535hp399kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 685Nm505lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.3s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 51.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 336hp/t251kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated | 325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 410Nm/t274lb-ft/ton Calculated | 416Nm/t279lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 570km354mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,259mm50in | 1,274mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,704mm106in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 165L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 73L |
| CO2 emissions | 259g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 5,750-6,750 rpm | 1,900-5,750 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 535 hp 399 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8 has 23 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 570 km 354 mi |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW | 3.7 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 535 hp 399 kW | 3.7 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 558 hp 416 kW | 535 hp 399 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 570 km 354 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 259 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8 | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) C 4.0 V8
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























