Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
Car comparison
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque685 Nm505 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight313 hp/t234 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 685Nm505lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,628kg3,589lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 54.7s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated | 298hp/t223kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 646km401mi Calculated | 691km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,465mm176in | 4,544mm179in |
| Width | 1,942mm76in | 1,939mm76in |
| Height | 1,273mm50in | 1,259mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,704mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,651mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 165L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 219g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 197 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 has 34 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 646 km 401 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 691 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 646 km 401 mi | 691 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 219 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Is 33 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























