Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8vsAston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful585 hp436 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight341 hp/t254 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 585hp436kW | 535hp399kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 685Nm505lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 50.2s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.4s Calculated | 10.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 341hp/t254kW/t155hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 436Nm/t292lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 496km308mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,354mm53in | 1,274mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,704mm106in |
| Front track | 1,683mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 321L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 675L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.4 s | 10.1 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 535 hp 399 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 has 50 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 3.2 s |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 3.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW | 3.2 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 535 hp 399 kW | 3.6 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Aston MartinV8 VantageF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 585 hp 436 kW | 535 hp 399 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 496 km 308 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 341 hp/t 254 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 | Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.68 LC100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,701 LC/year | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 115 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Aston Martin V8 Vantage F1 Edition 4.0 V8
- Is 325 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 133 km (83 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























