Aston Martin Rapide E
Car comparison
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWhvsLotus Emeya R 102 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Emeya
R 102 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Emeya R 102 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful918 hp685 kW
- Highest torque985 Nm726 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight354 hp/t264 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,140 kg4,718 lb
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 612hp456kW | 918hp685kW |
| Torque | 950Nm701lb-ft | 985Nm726lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 34.1s99% target: 253 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 9.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 354hp/t264kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 444Nm/t297lb-ft/ton Calculated | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,019mm198in | 5,139mm202in |
| Width | 1,929mm76in | 2,123mm84in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,989mm118in | 3,069mm121in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 509L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,388L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 9.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 10.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW |
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | 918 hp 685 kW |
Lotus Emeya R 102 kWh has 306 hp more than Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh and Lotus Emeya R 102 kWh: 306 hp (228 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | 985 Nm 726 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb |
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | 2,590 kg 5,710 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | 256 km/h 159 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 4.2 s |
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Emeya R 102 kWh and Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | 918 hp 685 kW | 2.8 s | 256 km/h 159 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | LotusEmeyaR 102 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 612 hp 456 kW | 918 hp 685 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | 985 Nm 726 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 256 km/h 159 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb | 2,590 kg 5,710 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 509 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
- Is 450 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Lotus Emeya R 102 kWh
- Has 306 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























