Aston Martin DBX
Car comparison
Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8vsBentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Bentayga EWB
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Most powerful707 hp527 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Lightest2,245 kg4,949 lb
- Best power-to-weight315 hp/t235 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk638 L
- Best overall score91/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 707hp527kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 770Nm568lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 2,514kg5,542lb |
| Gross weight | 3,020kg6,658lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 45.7s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.3s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 315hp/t235kW/t143hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,039mm198in | 5,305mm209in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,998mm79in |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,739mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 3,060mm120in | 3,175mm125in |
| Front track | 1,698mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,664mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 235mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 638L | 380L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 707 hp 527 kW |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 has 157 hp more than Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8: 157 hp (117 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 2,245 kg 4,949 lb |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 3.3 s |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 and Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 707 hp 527 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
| BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinDBX707 4.0 V8 | BentleyBentayga EWB4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 707 hp 527 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.3 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 290 km/h 180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,245 kg 4,949 lb | 2,514 kg 5,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 638 L 22.5 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 315 hp/t 235 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8 | Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.85 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,728 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin DBX 707 4.0 V8
- Has 157 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 269 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 96 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 258 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Bentley Bentayga EWB 4.0 V8
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























