Aston Martin DB9 Volante · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
Aston Martin DB9 Volante · Facelift 2012 6.0 V12vsRolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Dawn
6.6 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Lightest1,890 kg4,167 lb
- Best power-to-weight274 hp/t204 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.6 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque820 Nm605 lb-ft
- Lowest CO2 emissions330 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517hp386kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 820Nm605lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 2,560kg5,644lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 19.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.6L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK | 22.1L/100 km10.6mpg US12.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 274hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 545km339mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 6,592cc402cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 5,285mm208in |
| Width | 2,061mm81in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,282mm50in | 1,502mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 3,112mm123in |
| Trunk volume | - | 321L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 333g/km | 330g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 19.2 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has 54 hp more than Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 5.0 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 has more power, Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 and Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 274 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.6 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 274 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinDB9 VolanteFacelift 20126.0 V12 | Rolls-RoyceDawn6.6 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp 386 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 820 Nm 605 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | 2,560 kg 5,644 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 545 km 339 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 333 g/km | 330 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 274 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 | Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 25.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year | 3,780 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin DB9 Volante Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Is 670 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest CO2 emissions
Rolls-Royce Dawn 6.6 V12
- Has 54 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























