Ferrari California
Car comparison
Ferrari California 4.3 V8vsAston Martin DB9 Coupe · Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin DB9 Coupe · Facelift 2012
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari California 4.3 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed312 km/h194 mph
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range595 km370 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Most powerful517 hp386 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 490hp365kW | 517hp386kW |
| Torque | 505Nm372lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,785kg3,935lb |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated | 67.2s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 21.6L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 595km370mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,297cc262cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,562mm180in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,909mm75in | 2,061mm81in |
| Height | 1,322mm52in | 1,282mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 340L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 333g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari California 4.3 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 7,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 14.1 s |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 has 27 hp more than Ferrari California 4.3 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari California 4.3 V8 and Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 3.8 s |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 4.6 s |
Although Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 has more power, Ferrari California 4.3 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California 4.3 V8 and Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California 4.3 V8 and Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 595 km 370 mi |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW | 3.8 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.6 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari California 4.3 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariCalifornia4.3 V8 | Aston MartinDB9 CoupeFacelift 20126.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 490 hp 365 kW | 517 hp 386 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 595 km 370 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 333 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari California 4.3 V8 | Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari California 4.3 V8
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Aston Martin DB9 Coupe Facelift 2012 6.0 V12
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 115 Nm more
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























