Aston Martin DB12 Volante
Car comparison
Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8vsFerrari Portofino 3.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari Portofino
3.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight388 hp/t290 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range748 km465 mi
- Largest trunk292 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful680 hp507 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 680hp507kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 760Nm561lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,796kg3,960lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.0s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 10.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 379hp/t282kW/t172hp/1000 lb Calculated | 388hp/t290kW/t176hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 445Nm/t298lb-ft/ton Calculated | 492Nm/t329lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 639km397mi Calculated | 748km465mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,855cc235cu in |
| Length | 4,725mm186in | 4,586mm181in |
| Width | - | 1,938mm76in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,805mm110in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,633mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,635mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 95mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 262L | 292L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 245g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,750-6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,250 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 10.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 37.4 s | 55.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 680 hp 507 kW |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8 has 80 hp more than Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 and Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 3.5 s |
Although Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8 has more power, Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 and Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 and Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 388 hp/t 290 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 639 km 397 mi |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 748 km 465 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 680 hp 507 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 388 hp/t 290 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinDB12 Volante4.0 V8 | FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 680 hp 507 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 639 km 397 mi | 748 km 465 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 245 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 262 L 9.3 cu ft | 292 L 10.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 379 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 388 hp/t 290 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8 | Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin DB12 Volante 4.0 V8
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8
- Is 251 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























