Ferrari Portofino
Car comparison
Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8vsLamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder
5.2 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range748 km465 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Lightest1,542 kg3,400 lb
- Best power-to-weight396 hp/t295 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 610hp455kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,542kg3,400lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 324 km/h 201 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 61.7s99% target: 321 km/h / 199 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s | 10.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 388hp/t290kW/t176hp/1000 lb Calculated | 396hp/t295kW/t179hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 492Nm/t329lb-ft/ton Calculated | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 748km465mi Calculated | 675km419mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,855cc235cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,586mm181in | 4,459mm176in |
| Width | 1,938mm76in | 1,924mm76in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,180mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,620mm103in |
| Front track | 1,633mm64in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,620mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 292L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 245g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,250 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 8,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 10.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 55.7 s | 68.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 324 km/h 201 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 610 hp 455 kW |
Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10 has 10 hp more than Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 and Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 324 km/h 201 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 3.5 s |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10 and Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 and Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 388 hp/t 290 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 396 hp/t 295 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 748 km 465 mi |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 675 km 419 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 610 hp 455 kW | 3.4 s | 324 km/h 201 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | 388 hp/t 290 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | 396 hp/t 295 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariPortofino3.9 V8 | LamborghiniHuracan LP 610-4 Spyder5.2 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 610 hp 455 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 324 km/h 201 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 748 km 465 mi | 675 km 419 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 245 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 292 L 10.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 388 hp/t 290 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 396 hp/t 295 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8 | Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Portofino 3.9 V8
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Huracan LP 610-4 Spyder 5.2 V10
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 3 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























