Aston Martin DB11
Car comparison
Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8vsCadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac ATS Coupe
V 3.6 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful503 hp375 kW
- Highest torque675 Nm498 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range722 km449 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 503hp375kW | 471hp351kW |
| Torque | 675Nm498lb-ft | 603Nm445lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.2s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 384Nm/t257lb-ft/ton Calculated | 350Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km449mi Calculated | 488km303mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,564cc217cu in |
| Length | 4,750mm187in | 4,691mm185in |
| Width | 1,950mm77in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,290mm51in | 1,384mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,805mm110in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 295L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 5,850 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.7 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 194 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 503 hp 375 kW |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW |
Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8 has 32 hp more than Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 and Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 675 Nm 498 lb-ft |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 722 km 449 mi |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 488 km 303 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 503 hp 375 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 471 hp 351 kW | 4.2 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinDB114.0 V8 | CadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 503 hp 375 kW | 471 hp 351 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 675 Nm 498 lb-ft | 603 Nm 445 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 449 mi | 488 km 303 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 295 L 10.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8 | Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin DB11 4.0 V8
- Has 32 hp more
- Has 72 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 234 km (146 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac ATS Coupe V 3.6 V6
- Is 35 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























