Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0vsAlpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpine A110
GTS Aero Kit 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Lightest1,145 kg2,524 lb
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range634 km394 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,145kg2,524lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 54.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.1s | 12.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 634km394mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,530mm178in | 4,256mm168in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,293mm51in | 1,248mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,420mm95in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 6,300 rpm | 2,400-6,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.1 s | 12.8 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has 85 hp more than Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 1,145 kg 2,524 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.5 s |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 4.2 s |
Although Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has more power, Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 627 km 390 mi |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 634 km 394 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.5 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110GTS Aero Kit 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,145 kg 2,524 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 634 km 394 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 | Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Has 85 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alpine A110 GTS Aero Kit 1.8
- Is 325 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























