Alpina XB7
Car comparison
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8vsAston Martin DBX 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin DBX
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful621 hp463 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Largest trunk750 L
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score75/100
Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8
- Lightest2,245 kg4,949 lb
- Best power-to-weight245 hp/t183 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score86/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 621hp463kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,655kg5,853lb | 2,245kg4,949lb |
| Gross weight | 3,290kg7,253lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.9s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 5,039mm198in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,998mm79in |
| Height | 1,797mm71in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 3,060mm120in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,703mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 235mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 750L | 632L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 13.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 191 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 621 hp 463 kW |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 has 71 hp more than Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8 and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 71 hp (53 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 2,245 kg 4,949 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 4.2 s |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 and Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 621 hp 463 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 621 hp 463 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb | 2,245 kg 4,949 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 750 L 26.5 cu ft | 632 L 22.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8
- Has 71 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 118 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8
- Is 410 kg lighter
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























