Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8vsAlpina XB7 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina XB7
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lightest2,495 kg5,501 lb
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.9 L/100 km123.8 mpg US148.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range3,684 km2,289 mi
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score100/100
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8
- Most powerful621 hp463 kW
- Largest trunk750 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 599hp447kW | 621hp463kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,655kg5,853lb |
| Gross weight | 2,935kg6,471lb | 3,290kg7,253lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 85.9s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.9s | 14.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1.9L/100 km123.8mpg US148.7mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 321Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 3,684km2,289mi Calculated | 692km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,797mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | - | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,703mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 231mm9in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 750L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,344L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.9 s | 14.5 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 599 hp 447 kW |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 621 hp 463 kW |
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 has 22 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 3.6 s |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 4.2 s |
Although Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 1.9 L/100 km 123.8 mpg US 148.7 mpg UK |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 and Alpina XB7 4.4 V8: 10.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 3,684 km 2,289 mi |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 692 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 599 hp 447 kW | 3.6 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 621 hp 463 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 |
| 1.9 L/100 km 123.8 mpg US 148.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 1.9 L/100 km 123.8 mpg US 148.7 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 1.9 L/100 km 123.8 mpg US 148.7 mpg UK |
| AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | AlpinaXB74.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 599 hp 447 kW | 621 hp 463 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,655 kg 5,853 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.9 L/100 km 123.8 mpg US 148.7 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 3,684 km 2,289 mi | 692 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 750 L 26.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 | Alpina XB7 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1.9 L/100 km123.8 mpg US148.7 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 3.32 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 5.35 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 285 L75 US gal63 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 498.75 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 10.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 2,993 km (1,859 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Alpina XB7 4.4 V8
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 346 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























