Alpina Roadster V8
Car comparison
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32VvsBMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z3 M (E36/7)
3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score32/100
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight236 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW | 321hp239kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 62.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 785km488mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,837cc295cu in | 3,201cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,400mm173in | 4,025mm158in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,266mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,458mm97in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,492mm59in |
| Max trunk volume | - | 165L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 110 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 381 hp 284 kW |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V has 60 hp more than BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2 and Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 5.0 s |
Although Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V has more power, BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2 and Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaRoadster V84.8 i V8 32V | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 321 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 785 km 488 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina Roadster V8 4.8 i V8 32V
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























