BMW Z3 M (E36/7)
Car comparison
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2vsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995
SL 500 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful321 hp239 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight236 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption16.0 L/100 km14.7 mpg US17.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk265 L
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 321hp239kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Gross weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,201cc195cu in | 4,973cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,025mm158in | 4,499mm177in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,812mm71in |
| Height | 1,266mm50in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,458mm97in | 2,515mm99in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,492mm59in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 265L |
| Max trunk volume | 165L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2 has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8 and BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 5.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8: 1.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ3 M (E36/7)3.2 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 500 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 321 hp 239 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z3 M (E36/7) 3.2
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 475 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 62 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 SL 500 V8
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























