Alpina B7 (F01)
Car comparison
Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351)
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed312 km/h194 mph
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range808 km502 mi
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score80/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Lightest1,873 kg4,129 lb
- Best power-to-weight294 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 540hp403kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,873kg4,129lb |
| Gross weight | 2,660kg5,864lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.6s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated | 48.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.0s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 265hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 294hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 808km502mi Calculated | 707km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,092mm200in | 5,127mm202in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,070mm121in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,621mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,628mm64in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 5,200-6,250 rpm | 2,800-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 540 hp 403 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 550 hp 410 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged has 10 hp more than Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 4.6 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged has more power, Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 808 km 502 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 707 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 540 hp 403 kW | 4.6 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 540 hp 403 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 808 km 502 mi | 707 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 265 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 294 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 | Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XJ (X351) R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 167 kg lighter
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























