Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsAlpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2012-2015
VS

Alpina B7 (F01)

4.4 V8

540 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    300 km/h
    186 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Lightest
    1,875 kg
    4,134 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    293 hp/t
    219 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    730 Nm
    538 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.9 L/100 km
    23.8 mpg US
    28.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.5 L/100 km
    17.4 mpg US
    20.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    808 km
    502 mi
  • Best economy score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
Power
550hp410kW
540hp403kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
730Nm538lb-ft
Curb weight
1,875kg4,134lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,660kg5,864lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
312 km/h
194 mph
To 99% top speed
49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
52.6s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
11.6s
Calculated
12.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
12.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
265hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km376mi
Calculated
808km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,981mm196in
5,092mm200in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,485mm58in
Wheelbase
2,909mm115in
3,070mm121in
Front track
1,549mm61in
1,621mm64in
Rear track
1,563mm62in
1,628mm64in
Trunk volume
540L
500L
Max trunk volume
963L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
80L
CO2 emissions
270g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V85,200-6,250 rpm2,800-5,000 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.6 s
12.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
312 km/h
194 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
12.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
206 km/h
128 mph
203 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
540 hp
403 kW

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has 10 hp more than Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
730 Nm
538 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
2,040 kg
4,497 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
312 km/h
194 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V84.6 s
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V84.6 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
265 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
604 km
376 mi
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
808 km
502 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
540 hp
403 kW
4.6 s
312 km/h
194 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
312 km/h
194 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,092 mm
200.5 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
Power
540 hp
403 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
312 km/h
194 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
4.6 s
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
265 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
540 hp
403 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
730 Nm
538 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
312 km/h
194 mph
Lightness
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
2,040 kg
4,497 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
5,092 mm
200.5 in
Height
1,485 mm
58.5 in
Range score
604 km
376 mi
808 km
502 mi
CO2 score
270 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
265 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km17.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi27.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year2,599 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 165 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 204 km (127 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X250) R-S 5.0 V8
Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
GTS 3.8 V8
VS
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8vsMaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)GTS 3.8 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
4.4 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
R-S 5.0 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
4.4 V8
760i
VS
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8vsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012760i
R-S 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)S 3.0 V6
4.4 V8
6.0 W12
VS
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
4.4 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.0 TFSI COD V8
VS
AlpinaB7 (F01)4.4 V8vsAUDIS8 (D4)Facelift 20134.0 TFSI COD V8
R-S 5.0 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 vs Alpina B7 (F01) 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster