Bentley Continental GT
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurbovsAlpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B6 Coupe (E63)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight291 hp/t217 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score89/100
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best economy score61/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,800kg6,173lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 407Nm/t272lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 526km327mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,807mm189in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,371mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,598mm63in |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 13.5 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 192 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo has 60 hp more than Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 4.8 s |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo has more power, Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.8 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.6 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | AlpinaB6 Coupe (E63)4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 526 km 327 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alpina B6 Coupe (E63) 4.4 V8
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 665 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























