Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64)
Car comparison
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8vsFerrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F430 Spider
4.3 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions306 g/km
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Best power-to-weight354 hp/t264 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range605 km376 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 49.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 259hp/t193kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 354hp/t264kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 547km340mi Calculated | 605km376mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 4,308cc263cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,511mm178in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,217mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,598mm63in | 1,615mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Max trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 95L |
| CO2 emissions | 306g/km | 360g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 8,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 10.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 510 hp 380 kW |
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V has 10 hp more than Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 and Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 4.9 s |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V and Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 and Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 547 km 340 mi |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 605 km 376 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.7 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | FerrariF430 Spider4.3 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 547 km 340 mi | 605 km 376 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 306 g/km | 360 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 354 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 | Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8
- Has 230 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
- Emits 54 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ferrari F430 Spider 4.3 i V8 32V
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 95 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























