Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64)
Car comparison
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8vsAston Martin DB9 Volante 6.0 i V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin DB9 Volante
6.0 i V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption18.9 L/100 km12.4 mpg US14.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Aston Martin DB9 Volante 6.0 i V12
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight267 hp/t199 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 456hp340kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 77.4s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 25.2L/100 km9.3mpg US11.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 259hp/t193kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 267hp/t199kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 547km340mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,875mm74in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,318mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,568mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,598mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 197L |
| Max trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 306g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin DB9 Volante 6.0 i V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | 6,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | 456 hp 340 kW |
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 has 44 hp more than Aston Martin DB9 Volante 6.0 i V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin DB9 Volante 6.0 i V12 and Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8: 44 hp (33 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 4.9 s |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | 456 hp 340 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB6 Cabrio (E64)4.4 V8 | Aston MartinDB9 Volante6.0 i V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 456 hp 340 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,930 kg 4,255 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 547 km 340 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 306 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 197 L 7.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 259 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 267 hp/t 199 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B6 Cabrio (E64) 4.4 V8
- Has 44 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 253 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Aston Martin DB9 Volante 6.0 i V12
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























