Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0vsAlpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) · Facelift 2024 GT 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) · Facelift 2024
GT 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Most powerful529 hp394 kW
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range557 km346 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight380 hp/t284 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 529hp394kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 730Nm538lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Gross weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 72.9s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s | 11.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 380hp/t284kW/t173hp/1000 lb Calculated | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 386Nm/t258lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 464km288mi Calculated | 557km346mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,800mm189in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,457mm97in | 2,856mm112in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,593mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,290L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0: Power / Torque
- Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 8,500 rpm | 6,300 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 6,250-6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 11.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 197 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 529 hp 394 kW |
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 has 4 hp more than Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0 and Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 3.7 s |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 3.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 380 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 464 km 288 mi |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 557 km 346 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 529 hp 394 kW | 3.5 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 380 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 529 hp 394 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 464 km 288 mi | 557 km 346 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 380 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0 | Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0
- Is 510 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 101 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 265 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
- Has 338 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























