Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0vsPorsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Dakar (992)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight380 hp/t284 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk132 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Highest torque570 Nm420 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range638 km396 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 41.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s | 12.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 380hp/t284kW/t173hp/1000 lb Calculated | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 355Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 464km288mi Calculated | 638km396mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,530mm178in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,279mm50in | 1,338mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,457mm97in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | 132L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 67L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 8,500 rpm | 6,300 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,300-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 12.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0 has 45 hp more than Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 3.4 s |
Although Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0 has more power, Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 380 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 464 km 288 mi |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 638 km 396 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 |
| 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | 380 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)S/T 4.0 | Porsche911 Dakar (992)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 464 km 288 mi | 638 km 396 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 380 hp/t 284 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0 | Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) S/T 4.0
- Has 45 hp more
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
- Has 81 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Porsche 911 Dakar (992) 3.0
- Has 105 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























