Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) · Facelift 2024 GT 3.0vsBMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (G82)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful529 hp394 kW
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best practicality score61/100
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Lightest1,775 kg3,913 lb
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range584 km363 mi
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 529hp394kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.9s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 46.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.9s | 12.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 386Nm/t258lb-ft/ton Calculated | 366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 557km346mi Calculated | 584km363mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,800mm189in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,394mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,856mm112in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,593mm63in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,588mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 6,250-6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 529 hp 394 kW |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 has 19 hp more than BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 and Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 3.5 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 3.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 and Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 557 km 346 mi |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 584 km 363 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 529 hp 394 kW | 3.5 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)Facelift 2024GT 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 529 hp 394 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 557 km 346 mi | 584 km 363 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0 | BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) Facelift 2024 GT 3.0
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























