Car comparison

Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i BiturbovsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina B3 (E90)

3.0i Biturbo

360 hp2979 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2008-2013
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X

2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

359 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2008-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo

  • Fastest top speed
    280 km/h
    174 mph
  • Most powerful
    360 hp
    268 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    618 km
    384 mi
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i BiturboMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
360hp268kW
359hp268kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
363Nm268lb-ft
Curb weight
1,645kg3,627lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.1s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
14.0s
Calculated
12.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
11.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
618km384mi
Calculated
387km241mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,545mm179in
4,505mm177in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,810mm71in
Height
1,422mm56in
1,480mm58in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,650mm104in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,513mm60in
1,545mm61in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
450L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
55L
CO2 emissions-
328g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i BiturboMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360PowerTorque
  • Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo5,500-6,000 rpm3,800-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-3606,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i BiturboMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.0 s
12.0 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
7.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
10.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
11.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
191 km/h
118 mph
200 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
360 hp
268 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW

Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo has 1 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
363 Nm
268 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
280 km/h
174 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 4.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
618 km
384 mi
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
387 km
241 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
360 hp
268 kW
4.9 s
280 km/h
174 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
359 hp
268 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,545 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
359 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
4.9 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
4.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i BiturboMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Power
360 hp
268 kW
359 hp
268 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
4.1 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
14.2 L/100 km
16.6 mpg US
19.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,545 mm
178.9 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,505 mm
177.4 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Range score
618 km
384 mi
387 km
241 mi
CO2 score
-
328 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
219 hp/t
163 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
230 hp/t
172 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina B3 (E90) 3.0i BiturboMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km24.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi39.99 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year3,728 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 137 Nm more
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360

  • Is 85 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 - car comparison - FastVsFaster