Maserati Quattroporte S
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7vsAlpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B3 (E90)
3.0i Biturbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful430 hp321 kW
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 430hp321kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 2,365kg5,214lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.2s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 52.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 24L/100 km9.8mpg US11.8mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 573km356mi Calculated | 643km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 5,097mm201in | 4,545mm179in |
| Width | 1,885mm74in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,064mm121in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,513mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7: Power / Torque
- Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 3,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 13.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 430 hp 321 kW |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 360 hp 268 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7 has 70 hp more than Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo and Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 5.4 s |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 4.8 s |
Although Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7 has more power, Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo and Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo and Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7: 5.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 573 km 356 mi |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 643 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 430 hp 321 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.8 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte S4.7 | AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 430 hp 321 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 573 km 356 mi | 643 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7 | Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.49 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.24 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,357 L623 US gal518 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,124 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte S 4.7
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 345 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 km (43 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























