Alpina B3 (E46)
Car comparison
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24VvsVolvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60
R 2.5i 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed266 km/h165 mph
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range636 km395 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 335Nm247lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,614kg3,558lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.8s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.0s Calculated | 17.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 636km395mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,300cc201cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,471mm176in | 4,606mm181in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,395mm55in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,472mm58in | 1,542mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 424L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,034L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5,500 rpm | 1,950-5,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.0 s | 17.1 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 280 hp 209 kW |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW |
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V has 20 hp more than Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V and Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 335 Nm 247 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5.7 s |
Although Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V has more power, Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 583 km 362 mi |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 636 km 395 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.7 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 335 Nm 247 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 636 km 395 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V | Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V
- Is 164 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























