Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsAlpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B3 (E36)
3.2 i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 56.3s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 3,152cc192cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,698mm67in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,410mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,423mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 435L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 5,800 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 15 hp more than Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 6.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has more power, Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























