Alpina B3 (E36)
Car comparison
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24VvsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 39.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,152cc192cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,698mm67in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,410mm56in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,423mm56in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 5,800 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 has 15 hp more than Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 5.9 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 and Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 53 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























