Jaguar XJ (X308)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32VvsAlpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B10 (E39)
4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful363 hp271 kW
- Highest torque505 Nm372 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score73/100
Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 363hp271kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 505Nm372lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.0s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 643km399mi Calculated | 526km327mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 4,619cc282cu in |
| Length | 5,023mm198in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,799mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,345mm53in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,830mm111in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,498mm59in | 1,518mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 81L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 6,150 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,400 rpm |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 5,700 rpm | 3,700 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.0 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 363 hp 271 kW |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 347 hp 259 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V has 16 hp more than Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic and Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 262 km/h 163 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 5.6 s |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V and Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V and Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 643 km 399 mi |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 526 km 327 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 363 hp 271 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 347 hp 259 kW | 6.3 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic |
| 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 363 hp 271 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 262 km/h 163 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 643 km 399 mi | 526 km 327 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V | Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.05 LC100 km | 23.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,308 LC/year | 3,491 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 117 km (72 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























