Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8vsAlpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997

AMG C 55 V8

347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan1998-2000
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    347 hp
    259 kW
  • Highest torque
    510 Nm
    376 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.7 L/100 km
    20.1 mpg US
    24.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    530 km
    329 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Power
347hp259kW
347hp259kW
Torque
510Nm376lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,570kg3,461lb
1,540kg3,395lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
2,080kg4,586lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
262 km/h
163 mph
To 99% top speed
53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
59.0s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
16.3s
Calculated
18.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.4s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton
Calculated
312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
530km329mi
Calculated
526km327mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,439cc332cu in
4,619cc282cu in
Length
4,516mm178in
4,775mm188in
Width
1,723mm68in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,387mm55in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,830mm111in
Front track
1,509mm59in
1,512mm60in
Rear track
1,483mm58in
1,518mm60in
Trunk volume-
460L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
62L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V SwitchtronicPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
  • Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V85,500 rpm3,000-4,300 rpm5,750 rpm
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic5,700 rpm3,700 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.3 s
18.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
262 km/h
163 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.4 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.4 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
174 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
262 km/h
163 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
225 hp/t
168 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
347 hp
259 kW
6.3 s
262 km/h
163 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,516 mm
177.8 in
Height
1,387 mm
54.6 in
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,775 mm
188.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
262 km/h
163 mph
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
5.5 s
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
225 hp/t
168 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8AlpinaB10 (E39)4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Power
347 hp
259 kW
347 hp
259 kW
Torque
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
6.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
262 km/h
163 mph
Lightness
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,516 mm
177.8 in
Height
1,387 mm
54.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,775 mm
188.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
530 km
329 mi
526 km
327 mi
Trunk score
-
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
225 hp/t
168 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km23.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi37.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year3,491 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 55 V8
Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 vs Alpina B10 (E39) 4.6 i V8 32V Switchtronic - car comparison - FastVsFaster